Why choose Cardozo Law?
Cardozo’s faculty is ranked No. 22 in the country for scholarly impact by Heald & Sichelman's academic impact rankings of 100 American law schools. Cardozo Law’s Field Clinics and Externship opportunities provide a real-world edge in a competitive legal landscape.
Where does Cardozo Law School's faculty rank for scholarly impact?
Cardozo Law School’s faculty ranks 33rd in the nation for scholarly impact, according to the newly released version of the Leiter Scholarly Impact Score. Cardozo’s faculty is ranked No. 22 in the country for scholarly impact by Heald & Sichelman's academic impact rankings of 100 American law schools.
What is the Cardozo/Google patent Diversity Project?
The Cardozo/Google Patent Diversity Project expands patent protections for women and entrepreneurs of color. At right: Alumna Sheryl Gold '89 is the senior vice president, Business & Legal Affairs at Universal Music Group. "We must use our power as lawyers to speak up when others are silenced.
Who We Are
Cardozo Law School’s faculty ranks 33rd in the nation for scholarly impact, according to the newly released version of the Leiter Scholarly Impact Score. Cardozo’s faculty is ranked No. 22 in the country for scholarly impact by Heald & Sichelman's academic impact rankings of 100 American law schools.
A History of Criminal Justice Reform
"We must use our power as lawyers to speak up when others are silenced. We must raise our voices in defense of those who are victimized by racism, anti-Semitism and prejudice of any kind." -
Upcoming Events at Cardozo
Supporting Mental and Public Health Prevention Work in Pre-Atrocity, Atrocity, and Post-Atrocity Settings: Digital Dialogue Series
Our Areas of Study
Learn more about our top-ranked programs, including coursework, clinics, externships and events.
Edward A. Zelinsky
Under the dormant Commerce Clause, Massachusetts, New York and other states emulating them violate their constitutional duty to apportion when they tax the income nonresident telecommuters earn remotely working at their out-of-state homes.
Abstract
Under the dormant Commerce Clause, Massachusetts, New York and other states emulating them violate their constitutional duty to apportion when they tax the income nonresident telecommuters earn remotely working at their out-of-state homes.
Areas of Focus
Christine Tsai focuses her practice on advising entities and high-net-worth individuals in all aspects of tax planning and litigation.
Professional Highlights
Contributing author for The S Corporation: Planning and Operation and The S Corporation Answer Book, both Wolters Kluwer publications.
What is the Cardozo Law Institute?
The Cardozo Law Institute in Holocaust and Human Rights (CLIHHR, pronounced 'clear') is a leading global center for the study, teaching, and promotion of human rights. CLIHHR strengthens laws, norms, and institutions to prevent mass atrocities, protect affected populations, and rebuild societies in the wake of atrocities.
What is module 1 of the Immigration Law?
Module 1 traces the origins of the plenary power doctrine and broad judicial deference in immigration law, highlighting the ways in which current law and government policies are a continuation of past treatment of immigrants along identity lines.
What is tort legal theory?
Tort legal theory is utilized to present an understanding, framework, and establishment of the causal link between the enslavement of Black Americans and the ongoing systemic racism, injustice, and inequality that Black Americans face today. Using this Law Teaching Guide enables students to:
What are the teaching guides for law?
The 10 Law Teaching Guides are grounded in cases many professors already teach and include learning objectives, questions that can be used for in-class discussion or exams, and useful background. The Law Teaching Guides serve as a flexible resource professors can easily adapt for introductory survey courses or upper-level seminars to plan or update syllabi, individual lessons, exams and more.
What is Module 3?
Module 3 examines exclusion and deportation of noncitizens in light of constitutional due process guarantees, interrogating the “entry fiction” doctrine in consideration with U.S. international human rights law obligations—namely, the right to liberty and to be free from arbitrary detention.