Remote-access Guide

remote access 2.0 failed not approved

by Hailee Schuppe III Published 3 years ago Updated 2 years ago
image

Why is my API user not approved for access to Salesforce?

After entering credentials and attempting to login to Salesforce, the API user is denied access to the application and is typically accompanied by a Login History Status of "Failed: Not approved for access". This issue is caused when a Connected App is created but the API user is not authorized to access. Follow these steps to resolve this:

Why is my API user being denied access to the application?

After entering credentials and attempting to login to Salesforce, the API user is denied access to the application and is typically accompanied by a Login History Status of "Failed: Not approved for access". This issue is caused when a Connected App is created but the API user is not authorized to access.

What does restricted IP and login type = remote access mean?

Login history entries where Login Type = Remote Access 2.0 and Status = Restricted IP correspond to failed oAuth authentication attempts by Workbench on your behalf. Hope this will help you. If does, then mark it as the best answer so it can also help others in the future. Please go through below link.It may be helpful for you.

image

About Ericsson Remote Access 2.0

Ericsson Remote Access 2.0 Android app for Ericsson Remote Access 2.0 web platform.

Ratings & Reviews

This app works so much better than the last one. I like the new ability to filter rejected items in the checklist. That’s a huge time saver than scrolling and looking at the status values.

Recommended Review

We tested second phone apps for business owners and professionals who need a second phone number. Apps offer different perks and have different setbacks. Here is what we found.

Similar to Ericsson Remote Access 2.0

Access your TSplus server and your Windows applications from your own device.

Why is RDP vulnerable to MITM?

IMPORTANT: You are vulnerable to MITM attack when using RDP Security Layer because there is no Server Authentication. If you are running RDP over a VPN connection and there is no risk for interception then this may be okay. I recommend you re-enable TLS 1.0 and have a ssl certificate from a public authority set on your RDP-Tcp listener.

Is changing RDP port helping?

I do realize that changing the RDP port is not helping the protection. This port setting is left over from an earlier time when we did things differently and we were not using a VPN connection.

Does TLS 1.0 break RDP?

Disabling TLS 1.0 will break RDP under default settings. Did the security scan say specifically to disable TLS 1.0? Normally you should be able to disable use of certain ciphers or prioritize ciphers. You may want to try IISCrypto, on it you click the PCI button, then Apply button, then restart your server.

Does SBS have RDP?

I do have RDP on the SBS server set to an alternate port. It has been set that way for at least two years (and working fine). When I did the telnet connection I mentioned, I used the alternate port, and it connected fine, so I know the Windows Firewall is allowing the exception properly.

Does RDP work on SBS?

It's more likely something else as we have lots of other SBS boxes with these settings and rdp works fine.

Can I use vpn on a 3389?

I would set the 3389 back to the normal port and only use vpn to connect to the server. Moving to another port doesn't really protect it, tsgrinder can check for rdp listening on another port.

image
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9